About That Game 7…

That was lame.

I hate it when people (especially beat writers- ahem) say “there’s no excuse,” for this or that. In reality there is almost always an excuse, it’s just that some excuses are a lot better than others. In the Sabres’ case, I actually think their excuses for game 7 are pretty solid:

- The Sabres are reeeeeally not as good as the Flyers.

- After game 6, I accidentally drank a beer brewed outside of Philly. That’s a powerful jinx. (Sorry, guys.)

- The return of a probably-still-concussed Jochen Hecht was billed as great news. Think about that.

- Daniel Briere is a cheap-shotting, whining, disgusting-faced, DIVORCED, sniveling baby, AND I HATE HIM, but it would have been a LOT easier to win that series if he were playing for the Sabres instead of the Flyers.

- The Flyers refused to play Leighton, and thus refused to give us a three-goal handicap in the first period. Bastards.

- Half the roster was injured, and the other half was playing injured. Jordan Leopold has, like, 10,000 injuries/flus, and he was STILL deemed a better choice than Steve Montador.  (And Steve Montador was considered a top 4 defenseman by the Sabres at the trade deadline.) My point is that, due to a variety of reasons, the roster was profoundly effed up last night.

- Apparently the Sabres need both Pominville AND Connolly in order to win. Who knew?

- Is it even possible to come back in game 7 after that game 6? I say no.

But, after all the excuses are gathered and accounted for, the last game of the season left me with a few burning questions.

1. What are the Sabres going to do in the offseason? I loved this season. LOVED IT. But, if I’m being honest, I never really bought into this team as a legit Cup contender.  They were a “Well, if the cards fall just right, they might have a shot!” team. Which is certainly not nothing. (Again, I cannot emphasize enough how much I enjoyed this team and this season.) This crew overachieved, and as fun as it was, it would be silly to assume they can do it again. Or… maybe it isn’t. Honestly, I have no idea, and that’s kind of my point. I have NO IDEA what is up with these guys anymore. I mostly mean that in a good way.

The only thing I know for sure is that if they’re going to let Timmy walk (and sweet merciful heaven, I hope they do), they HAVE to get someone as good or better. If we come back in October and Darcy is all, “Paul Byron is the new Tim Connolly,” I’m going to be irked. Paul Byron is not the new Tim Connolly, he’s the new hopefully-someday-he’ll-be-as-good-as Tim Connolly.  There’s a difference.

I’m REALLY curious to see how Darcy proceeds when the expectations are increased. If winning the Cup is the goal, then the plan for getting there must assume that the team is better next season than they were this season.  You can’t assume that the young guys are going to all pan out. The teams that win the Cup go out into free agency, and they pick up proven performers. DO IT, DARCY.

2. Why has no one mentioned that Jochen Hecht almost certainly played last night with a concussion?  As much as I like to pretend that I don’t care about the players as people, I’ve gotten increasingly grossed out by concussions this season. Frankly, I was a little disturbed that Hecht came back last night. Concussions are no joke. If the Sabres are trying to suggest that Jochen being cleared to play just happened to miraculously coincide with their monumental need for non-AHL forwards they’re assuming that a). we’re REALLY stupid, and b). we don’t care about Jochen Hecht’s brain. (Both assumptions might be totally true, actually.)

All I’m saying is that the NHL is going to have to learn how to deal with concussions like grown-ups eventually. The sooner the better, if you ask me. In retrospect, I have to assume Jochen Hecht (and his family) would agree the risk was not worth the reward.

3. What’s up with Butts? I do NOT understand Chris Butler. One second he’s benched for four months, and the next second he’s playing for 30 minutes a game, and the next second on the ice for 45,000 goals against during the playoffs. Some players really confuse me, and he’s one of them.

4. Why did Lindy pull Crunchy when he did? And why did the Sabres seem so defeated from the very beginning of the game? As I covered earlier in this post, there are lots of totally reasonable excuses for this loss, but the fact that the team never, not for one second looked mentally prepared was a real disappointment. I mean, there’s losing, and then there’s complete submission. Unfortch, the Sabres pretty much laid down and exposed their bare, vulnerable bellies to the Flyers, which is the international sign for, “Please don’t hurt us.” It’s not the end of the world, but after the run they had, the lopsided loss was pretty unexpected. I mean, at least smash someone’s face into the boards, guys.

As for Lindy pulling Crunchy when he did- I thought that was totally bizarre. There are three types of goalie changes. There’s the, “OMG, you’re the worst goalie in the world”, (this one did not apply to Crunchy last night), there’s the, “I’m going to try to wake you guys up by taking away your star goalie,” and there’s the, “Fuck it. We’re losing this game, let’s just get the poor guy out of there.” Lindy’s decision to pull Miller when he did felt like the, “Fuck it, we’re losing anyway,” variety. Which is weird, because, well… it was pretty obviously the last game of the season.

I dunno. Maybe Miller was just relieved to get the eff out of there.

5. How awesome was Rob Niedermayer?  Look, I know he was mostly poo during the regular season, but the way Nieds elevated his game in the playoffs was impressive. It made me realize that it IS possible to have players who magically find another gear in the postseason, and it made me want MORE of those kinds of players. I hope the baby Sabres were paying attention to Old Man Niedermayer this year.

10 Responses to “About That Game 7…”


  1. 1 NoththeOriginalSam April 27, 2011 at 1:13 pm

    Well said, Kate.

    I am totally feeling your comments about Nieds.. all year it was like, “seriously, what do the Sabres see in this bum?” and then when the playoffs hit it was like.. “Oooooohh THAT is why we have him!” Crazy stuff.

    I was sad about the level of disorganization last night.. it was disappointing to watch such a pathetic end to a great run.

    And I hate all the Flyers- they are dirty bastards. I don’t even respect any of them.. except maaaaybe Boucher. he might be all right. The rest are bums. Especially Briere. He’s totally dead to me!

    Bring on the summer and Pegula-nessssss

  2. 2 Eric April 27, 2011 at 1:14 pm

    Hey – after last night, I didn’t want to think much about the season and especially the series…but I still found myself coming here today. Thanks for the little pick-up, some perspective, and humor in all of your writing; I’ll be coming back next season to hopefully see the Sabres hoist Lord Stanley’s cup in 2012.

  3. 3 SueInVA April 27, 2011 at 1:16 pm

    Well said as always.

    If you happen to see Mike Grier or Paul Gaustad around town would you give them a hug for me? They sure look like they could use one. Make sure to tell Paul G. it’s from me!! ;)

  4. 4 Dan April 27, 2011 at 1:35 pm

    Great insight. My heart went out to Goose and Grier, and thanks much for giving the shout out to Old Man Niedermayer. I think if this organization doesn’t manage to sign Grier, Nieds, and/or Parrish to at least play in Portland they’re going to lose a lot…I think there is a lot to be said for what a veteran can do down there, and I think our call-ups and young-ins were better off because of it.

    Pulling Miller down 4 goals in the 3rd period just plain stunk of giving up. But then again, the rest of the team would have had to show up in the first place…as it was there wasn’t really a towel to throw in.

  5. 5 Mark B. April 27, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    I was under the impression that Jochen had been skating for awhile and Lindy did say a few days ago that both he and Derek were close (before the injuries). So I *think* he passed all the concussion test stuff. Maybe? Not completely sure now.

  6. 6 Katebits April 27, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    Thank you everyone! Thanks for sharing this season with me. It’s been a blast.

    I’m highly suspicious of the Hecht situation, Mark. As far as I know, the Sabres never even admitted that it was a concussion. That leaves them a little wiggle room to say “He’s playing at 70%.” I’m sure that there are rules for concussions, and I sure hope the Sabres follow those rules, but again, I think it’s HIGHLY suspect that he was suddenly cleared to play when their need was the most desperate.

  7. 7 CrotchetyOriginalSam April 27, 2011 at 4:53 pm

    Kate and I talked about this during the third period last night, but as this comments section’s resident evil Flyers fan, I just want to get it out there: I could not agree more that pulling Miller in that spot – unless he and Lindy have some sort of super-secret batsignal worked out for these situations and it was flashing frantically – was incredibly disrespectful to the one guy on the ice for the Sabres who I saw doing almost everything right last night and throughout the series.

    I was watching several of these games with another Flyers fan, and watching Ryan Miller foil scoring chance after scoring chance in a series that I was pretty sure wouldn’t go more than five games was beyond frustrating. Kate nailed it in a tweet a few days ago shortly after yet another outstanding save: (paraphrasing) And THAT is why you have Ryan Miller and not a revolving collection of crappy goaltenders.

  8. 8 Mike in Idaho April 28, 2011 at 2:16 pm

    I was disgusted by game 7 but I have a plan to fix everything. In the offseason I think you guys need an old defenseman to settle down the youngsters (like what Rivet was supposed to be doing). Gragnani I think has potential but I think some more development time wouldn’t hurt him. Miller was fantastic, I would let Connoly go and I would trade Stafford. I know he’s your favorite zombie but he played the part far too much in this series and you might be able to trick another team into picking him up since he got lots of goals this season but he was very streaky.

    • 9 NoththeOriginalSam April 28, 2011 at 11:00 pm

      Mike I totally agree about Stafford- the Sabres should have traded him when he was hot at the deadline.. I knew he would disappear again- it’s what he does. His stock was soaring when he was playing well in Jan-Feb but then he vanished again once Vanek picked up the pace again.

      Connolly’s time here is DONE. (can it be? pretty please?)


  1. 1 NYHJ Sabres Blog » Blog Archive » Everything’s Gonna Be OK. Really. Trackback on April 28, 2011 at 8:02 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




…A Blog About the Buffalo Sabres

Observations 2
I can be reached at: willfulcaboose [at] gmail [dot] com

For All Your Facebook “Needs”

Categories

puck goggles
In accordance with the Fair Use Copyright Law, The Willful Caboose uses logos and registered trademarks of the National Hockey League to convey my criticism and inform the public of the Sabres' suckitude/badassitude (whatever the case may be). Photos on The Willful Caboose are used without permission, but do not interfere with said owner's profit. If you own a specific image on this site and want it removed, please e-mail me (willfulcaboose [at] gmail [dot] com) and I will be more than happy willing to oblige. (Special thanks to The Pensblog for their help with this disclaimer.)

Pages


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 67 other followers

%d bloggers like this: